Huawei p40 pro or Sony Rx100 m6?

I wonder if the Huawei P40 pro can get a Sony Rx100 m6 that is operated by a photographer who has some idea of photography in terms of image quality. Because I read that the Huawei P40 pro has a 1 / 1.28 inch sensor which is 78% of a normal 1 inch sensor. So just a small size difference. So what do you think?

My Note 10+ takes my amazingly extremely good photos and would say that it is very close to putting my A6000 in my pocket. My father put his DSLR down because the cell phone is better for him

Apart from the fact that cell phones are only suitable for photography to a limited extent, the RX also has the edge in image quality. The only question is whether you can see it so clearly under optimal conditions. But image quality is not everything anyway.

The P40 Pro can outperform the RX100 in certain situations as long as you don't zoom into the picture. E.g. In night photography through the special night mode in which it offsets multiple images. When not zooming, the cell phone can make optimal use of its 50 megapixel sensor or 40 megapixel ultrawide sensor.

As soon as you use the zoom, the Huawei is at a disadvantage. Its 5x zoom only has a 12 megapixel resolution and everything above it will be used to calculate multiple images.

The RX100 VI, on the other hand, has an optical 8.3x zoom, which the Huawei should depend on in all areas.

Don't worry, as soon as you start to take some pictures you will notice that your note is very, very far from the a6000 being stuck somewhere.

Thank you

I've been dealing with it for several years. Fortunately, that's my opinion.

You can also think that 1 + 1 = 3, it is wrong anyway.
Subjectively, the untrained eye and good situations may not notice any difference, but cell phones can't reach cameras. Although today's generation is so blinded by filters that there's no objective reference to photography (not related to itself)

How does it outperform the RX? More pixels = better or how?

With Jan it is not worth discussing. Half a year ago he was of the opinion that his grade would take better pictures than a DSLM.

He seems to belong to the group of "snapshot photographers".

Whereby "photographer" would be an insult to the people who could really call themselves that…

P30 Pro vs. Canon G7X Mark III, at 1:00 minute
And the G7XIII has a much faster lens than the RX100 VI

An increase in saturation, contrast and software sharpening is not a quality feature.

The G7X is also sharpening software. I also hardly think that you could sharpen the image of the G7X so much that it reaches the level of detail of the P30. The advantage here is simple that the sensor of the P30 Pro captures more details due to the more megapixels and the aggregation of several images, while the G7X has to go high with the ISO and therefore the quality suffers. I have a P30 Pro myself and know what I'm talking about, the quality without zoom can even keep up with a APS-C and kit lens.

Half a year ago I said something like that? So please read it correctly.

Maybe it was 4 months… But I remember well that you wanted to tell me that your grade would be as good as the DSLM or maybe even better.

I've only got the grade for 2 weeks so it can't be. I think the note comes very close to a camera. You should always look at the overall package and the smartphone is clearly ahead.