Can one speak of state piracy in this case?

I read the following on GIGA.de:

The air for https://www.giga.de/...en/huawei/ is getting thinner and thinner: as it has now become known, a new law in the US is intended to ensure that patent claims of the Group can no longer be enforced. Huawei could escape so a few billion US dollars.

https://www.giga.de/...te-nehmen/

In this case, can one speak of state-run piracy by the US?

What do you think?

That would be breaking the law and robbing intellectual property.

All other foreign holders of international patents have a say in the USA.

Who knows who else will happen next?

I think such an attempt of license fraud would have to be thwarted by US courts.

But who knows, we're always watching over everything that Uncle Sam is currently tampering with.

My boycott call. No one really took it seriously against the USA a few weeks ago.

Can stupid for us consumers go out, or generally the workers in Germany.

If anything, it would be "trumpian" piracy.

Not all in the US are or think like that.

But now opposite Huawei, trump's methodology has been implemented immediately. Strange that it especially US-American companies, or those in friendly South Korea benefit.

What you can't enforce in the name of "security".

But the laws are state and not Trump. Or not?

True - but as if he would stick to it.

There were already enough examples where he was then stopped by his own courts.

It's not about all foreign-held patents, but about corporations that are on a US watchlist.

So far this is just a report about a speculative project. So much Blabla without concrete and practical substance.

I find such a course very unlikely, because it could just as easily be positioned by all other countries against US patents.

Although I lack knowledge of US patent law, but also the imagination of how to legitimize such a rule of law.

In this respect, that remains for me a marginal note in the mutual propaganda war between China and the USA.

Who designs the legislation? It's about changing existing law. That does not make the mob… This is already responsible for the executive.

Which ultimately led to the fact that he has occupied highest judge posts with party members. One can only hope that Parliament slaps the door in his face. You can't rely on the judges permanently.

Such lists are not static.

That's true…

But nobody has influence on this watchlist outside of the USA. So there's always an uncertainty factor.

Who designs the legislation?

Certainly not the president alone. Otherwise one could speak of a dictatorship.

The executive does not make the laws but the legislature, but no matter, the senators want to be re-elected by their poebel. Democracy and so on…