There are descending in quality.
Appel A
Huawei Kirin
Snapdragon for many manufacturers
Samsung Exynos
Mediatek for many manufacturers
Which processor do you prefer?
Exynos, simply because it's the best on the market (in the overall package, which means efficiency, media decoding, etc.).
Ne is the 2 schlettchteste currently… But thanks for the answer
Says who?
Especially the US Samsung with Snapdragon perform worse than the Int. Versions with Exynos.
Personally, I personally prefer Snapdragon but can't say bad about Kirin 970 in everyday life.
There you live in the past… But if you like to believe that, I do not want to dissuade you
How quality? If so, then you can distinguish performance, but quality? They are all made at Samsung, GloFo or TSMC in the end, there are no qualitative differences. And then the comparison still lags. You can only compare individual products and not all the manufacturers. That would be like comparing Intel / AMD. Thus, AMD would be better because their 32-Kerner with Intel's 18-Kerner wipes the floor, if the software scales well.
And if we refer to the comparison now only on the top models, then your gradation is wrong. Correct would be:
A12 Bionic> Exynos 9810 / Snapdragon 845> Kirin 970> Helio P60
You can roll the dice between the Samsung and the Qualcomm. The Exynos is better for the CPU, the Snapdragon for the GPU part.
They bring out new parts regularly, because you just compare the best socs of the manufacturers…
how do you come to the p = midsegment = topmodell? Or the others… Exynos has feathered this year
Because the P60 is better than the old X30 in every way? And where did Samsung leave feathers? Their M3 is still better than Qualcomm's Cryo 385.
